Allowed

Sudarshan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Urban Development Cum Appellate Authority

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2026C.M.P./761/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed a Civil Misc. Petition for restoration of Writ Petition No.946 of 2022 on an unconditional apology by counsel, subject to removal of the surviving defect within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Civil Misc. Petition allowed; Writ Petition No.946 of 2022 restored to file with condition to remove defect within four weeks.

Sudarshan Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:27415

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.761 of 2026

¶3

Sudarshan Prasad, son of Late Ramraj Prasad, resident of Saldih Basti, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikela-Kharsawan.

¶4

… … Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development cum Appellate Authority of Jharkhand State Housing Board and Housing Board, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Bhawan, HEC, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi.

¶7

Jharkhand State Housing Board, through its Secretary, having its office at Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District Ranchi.

¶8

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Housing Board, Jamshedpur Division, having its office at Adityapur, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District Saraikela-Kharsawan.

¶9

… … Opposite Parties

¶10

CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

¶11

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manindra Kr. Sinha, Advocate

¶12

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar Shekhar, AC to SC (L&C)-II Mr. Srikant Swaroop, Advocate -----

¶13

02/ 11.09.2026

¶14

Heard the parties.

¶15

2. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of writ petition being W.P.(C) No.946 of 2022, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 29.08.2023, for removing the surviving defect.

¶16

3. Learned counsel representing the petitioner begs an unconditional apology and submits that no sooner the writ petition is restored to its original file, he will remove the surviving defect.

¶17

4. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties do not oppose the aforesaid submission.

¶18

¶19

2026:JHHC:27415

¶20

5. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioner, this Civil Misc. Petition is allowed . 6. The writ petition being W.P.(C) No.946 of 2022, is restored to its original file with a condition that the defect, if any, is still not removed, the same shall be removed within four weeks, failing which, this order will not be given effect to.

¶21

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶22

11^th September, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2

¶23

Uploaded on 14.09.2026

¶24

Sudarshan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Urban Development Cum Appellate Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudarshan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Urban Development Cum Appellate Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases