Bail application dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 2026:JHHC:28194 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6831 of 2026
------
Sumant Kumar @ Mahakal, aged about 34 years, son of Shivendra Singh, Resident of Village- Chaukhra, P.O.- Ankupa, P.S.Kutumbum, Dist.- Aurangabad, Bihar .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the Opp. Party : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl. P.P.
------
Order No:-04 Dated:-17-09-2026
Heard the learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State.
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State submits that since there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this bail application.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Dated:- 17.09.2026 Vedanti/
Sumant Kumar @ Mahakal
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
