Taiyab Ansari Biru @ Md. Taiyab Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

[ 2026:JHHC:21419 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6715 of 2026

------

Taiyab Ansari Biru @ Md. Taiyab Ansari, Son of Saharuddin Ansari, aged about 37 years Resident of Bhat Boreya, Benti, P.O. – Ratu, P.S. – Burmu, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶5

.... .... …. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

------

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Bandana Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------

¶9

Order No:-02 Dated:-20-07-2026

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(4), 308(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner demanded extortion through mobile phone and threatened that; otherwise the shop of the informant shall be blasted with bomb and on the next day, two persons came on a bike and threw two bombs. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Mojib Ansari and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is one of the conspirators who said that the informant is a monied man; so, money can be extracted from him by way of extortion. It is also submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.04.2026 as mentioned in para14 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the

¶13

instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 27.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.372 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶15

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class-XX, Ranchi in connection with Thakurgaon P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Dated:- 20.07.2026 Saroj/

Taiyab Ansari Biru @ Md. Taiyab Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taiyab Ansari Biru @ Md. Taiyab Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ranjan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abdul Mojid Mandal @ Abdul Majid Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ramesh Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Akhilesh Kumar Bosa @ Aklkesh Bosa Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jeki Kalindi Alias Jeki Dom Alias Jaiki Kalindi Alias Jaikey Dome Vs the State of Jharkhand