Arif Ansari Alias Arbaz Alias Arbaz Ansari Alias Arbaj Vs the State of Jharkhand

( 2026:JHHC:20776 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6569 of 2026

Arif Ansari @ Arbaz @ Arbaz Ansari @ Arbaj, aged about 30 years, s/o Nizamuddin, r/o Gous Nagar, Bharra, P.O. & P.S.Chira Chas, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl. P.P.

¶9

------

¶10

Order No.02 Dated- 14.07.2026

¶11

Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chira Chas P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 363/365/364/302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons abducted Khalik Ansari and committed his murder and threw the dead body of Khalik Ansari to screen themselves of the offence. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR which was registered three years after the alleged abduction/missing of the deceased. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the coaccused persons and the DNA sample of the skeleton attributed to be of the deceased has not been received. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.08 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial

¶14

of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶15

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶16

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bokaro, in connection with Chira Chas P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶17

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶18

14.07.2026 Gunjan-

Arif Ansari Alias Arbaz Alias Arbaz Ansari Alias Arbaj v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arif Ansari Alias Arbaz Alias Arbaz Ansari Alias Arbaj v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Purn Kumar Swansi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Krishna Kumar Gupta @ Krishna Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Badal Raj Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rohan Gope Alias Poltu Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ravi Oraon @ Bala Vs the State of Jharkhand