Rahul Ram @ Nepali Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Rahul Ram @ Nepali Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 / G.R. Case No.633 of 2026, subject to conditions of co-operation with the trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card copy with an undertaking not to change the mobile number, and not to annoy or disturb the witnesses during the trial.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused in Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 (G.R. Case No.633 of 2026) for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352 and 109(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, should be enlarged on bail.

Court's answer

The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.633 of 2026.

Ratio / Principle

Bail is granted subject to conditions: the petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial, and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted (Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi) — Offences punishable under Ss. 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352 and 109(2), B.N.S., 2023 — Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 / G.R. Case No.633 of 2026 — allegation that petitioner attempted to murder the informant's brother (Rishi Kumar Ram @ Golu) by assaulting him with a paper cutter — petitioner in custody since 18.02.2026; charge-sheet submitted but no witness examined; counsel stated petitioner has no criminal antecedent — held: petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur, subject to conditions that he co-operate with the trial, furnish his mobile number and Aadhar Card copy with an undertaking not to change the number, and not annoy or disturb the witnesses.

[2026:JHHC:19745] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6204 of 2026

------

Rahul Ram @ Nepali, aged about 32 years, S/O- Suresh Ram, R/O- H. No. 22, Kanchan Nagar, Near Hanuman Mandir, Burmamines, P.O. & P.S.- Burmamines, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand

.... .... …. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party

-----CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P ------

Order No.02 Dated-06-07-2026

Heard the parties.

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.633 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 118 (1), 352, 109 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the brother of the informant namely Rishi Kumar Ram @ Golu by assaulting him with a paper cutter. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-13 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.02.2026 as has been

mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1^st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Burmamines P.S. Case No.12 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No.633 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

Dated-06.07.2026-Animesh/