Md. Arslan @ Md. Arsalan Vs the State of Jharkhand

( 2026:JHHC:19255 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6034 of 2026

------

Md. Arslan @ Md. Arsalan, aged about 19 years, S/o Md. Alamgir @ Md. Alamgeer, R/o -133, Tanjim Nagar, Near Adivasi Football Ground, Hindpiri, P.O.-G.P.O. & P.S.-Hindpiri, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶4

Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party

¶5

------

¶6

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate : Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P

¶8

Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2026

¶9

Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) of B.N.S, 2023.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted money bags of the workers of M/s Dina Petro Villa which is a petrol pump. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations are false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR without putting him on T.I.P. as mentioned in para10 of this bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-11 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.03.2026 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail

¶13

of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Ranchi in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2026 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case .

¶15

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶16

01/07/2026 Abhiraj/

Md. Arslan @ Md. Arsalan v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Arslan @ Md. Arsalan v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Khalkho Vs State of Jharkhand

Sonalal Tudu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vinay Kumar Gupta And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.

Ashok Nayak Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pravin Ram Vs the State of Jharkhand