Manoj Kumar Saw @ Manoj Kumar Sao v. State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail rejection; renewal/second bail application; parity with co-accused; no recovery; no TIP; CDR; mobile number found at place of occurrence; different footing; gang membership allegation; extortion; burning of vehicles; Chandwa P.S. Case No. 161/2025; G.R. No. 915 of 2025; S.T. Case No. 275/2025; Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar; B.N.S. 2023 Sections 111(1), 111(4), 308(1), 308(5), 308(6), 109, 326(g), 61, 3(5); Section 27 Arms Act; B.A. No. 5673 of 2026; earlier rejection in B.A. No. 1851 of 2026 (16.03.2026); Mithun Lohra bail in B.A. No. 3562 of 2026 (15.05.2026); Manoj Kumar Saw @ Manoj Kumar Sao; Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; dated 03.07.2026.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner's case is on a different footing from that of the co-accused enlarged on bail because, during investigation, the CDR showed the petitioner's mobile number at the place of occurrence.