Allowed¶23

Gopal Oraon v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Jun 2026C.M.P./525/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration petition; dismissal for default; WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023; C.M.P. No. 525 of 2026; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; Ananda Sen, J.; decision date 19.06.2026; defects to be removed within four weeks; petitioners Gopal Oraon, Somra Oraon, Birsamuni Kumari @ Birsamuni Beck, Pramod Oraon, Alka Devi; Gumla; State of Jharkhand; Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reform; District Land Acquisition Officer; National Highway Authority of India (NHAI); neutral citation 2026:JHHC:17902.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023 to its original file; petitioners expected to remove the office-pointed defects within four weeks. ¶23

Gopal Oraon Vs State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:JHHC:17902

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

C.M.P. No. 525 of 2026

¶4

Gopal Oraon, son of Charo Oraon, resident of village Pandaria, P.O and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand.

¶5

Somra Oraon, son of Jhingra Oraon, resident of village Pandaria, P.O and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand.

¶6

Birsamuni Kumari @ Birsamuni Beck, daughter of Bandhan Oraon, resident of village Pandaria, P.O and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand.

¶7

Pramod Oraon, son of Charo Oraon, resident of village Pandaria, P.O and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand.

¶8

Alka Devi, wife of Amod Oroan, resident of village Pandaria, P.O and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner(s). Versus

¶9

State of Jharkhand

¶10

The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reform, at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi.

¶11

The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla.

¶12

The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Gumla.

¶13

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Gumla.

¶14

Chair Person of National Highway Authority of India at Sector 10 Dwarika, P.O and P.S. Dwarika, New Delhi.

¶15

The Regional Head of National Highway Authority Ranchi, Jharkhand. . . … Opp. Party(s).

¶16

CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.

¶17

-----For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ajeet Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Abhilash Kumar, AC to GP-II For NHAI M/s Sweety Topno and Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocates.

¶18

¶19

02/19.06.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

This restoration petition has been filed for restoration of WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023, which was dismissed for default vide order dated 06.02.2024 as the defects were not removed within peremptory time.

¶21

Counsel for the petitioner submits that no sooner the writ petition is restored, they will take necessary steps to remove the defects within a period of four weeks.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid submission, I am inclined to allow this restoration petition. Accordingly, this petition is allowed .

¶23

Consequently, WP(C) No. 1030 of 2023 is restored to its original file. It is expected that the petitioner will remove the defects as pointed out by the office in writ petition within four weeks.

¶24

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶25

19^th June, 2026 Anu/SKC-Cp2.

Gopal Oraon v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopal Oraon v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarju Dangi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pramod Kumar Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Moinuddin, Proprietor of M/S a. R. Agencies Vs Bank of Baroda through Chief Manager/Authorised Officer

Binod Layak Vs Ashok Baghot

Daulat Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

The State of Jharkhand Represented through the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau Vs Bishram Dubey