In 2026:JHHC:27643, the Jharkhand High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application where petitioners lacked credible apprehension of arrest or a non-bailable warrant in a pending Section 33 Indian Forest Act case.
Anticipatory bail application disposed with liberty to file a petition in the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:27643
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5126 of 2026
------
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sushant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Special P.P.
------
02/14.09.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J . )
Dated 14.09.2026 Anit
Uploaded 16.09.2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail when no arrest apprehension or non-bailable warrant has been substantiated.
Mahendra Ganjhu
Rajkumar Ganjhu
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
