Sanjeev Kumar Mishra v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Two petitioners, directors of a recovery agency, were charged for possessing a seized vehicle after failing to produce it to the bank. The single-judge high court rejected their prayer for anticipatory bail.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
What the court decided
2026:JHHC:27352
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4415 of 2026
------
Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, age 39 years, son of Chand Keshwar Mishra, resident of Village Dumardaga Sainik Colony, H. No.250, P.O. Buti, P.S. Khelgaon, District Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
With
A.B.A. No. 4518 of 2026
------
Md. Azharuddin, aged 32 years, son of Md. Isha Shaikh, resident of Village Raghunandanpur, Chanchki, Prithi Nagar, P.O. Prithi Nagar, P.S. Town Thana Pakur, District Pakur, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioners accused of failing to produce a seized mortgaged vehicle to the bank.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjeev Kumar Mishra and Md. Azharuddin
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./4415/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court