Allowed

Subhash Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Jun 2026B.A./3764/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by a person alleged to be a member of banned organization T.P.C. with a country-made pistol and two live cartridges recovered from him; charge sheet filed but no witness examined and custody since 11.02.2026. Court granted regular bail with conditions including cooperation with trial, mobile number disclosure, and non-tampering with witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of like amount to satisfaction of J.M. 1st Class, Latehar, with conditions of trial cooperation, mobile number/Aadhaar furnishing

Subhash Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

( 2026:JHHC:17990 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3764 of 2026

¶2

Subhash Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Nageshwar Saw @ Nageshwar Sao, resident of Village-Mirsraul, P.O.Khadhaiya, P.S.-Tandwa, Dist.-Chatra (Jharkhand)

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶5

------

¶6

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Sr. Advocate : Ms. Shabina Perween, Advocate : Ms. Sumitra Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------

¶8

Order No.03 Dated- 19.06.2026

¶9

Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 111(3)/ 111(4)/ 308(4)/ 308(5)/ 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of Arms Act and under Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

¶11

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was member of banned organization T.P.C. and they were apprehended by police and from the possession of the petitioner, one country made pistol and two live cartridges have been recovered. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.11 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 12 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb

¶12

the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

¶13

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Latehar, in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No.09 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

¶15

19.06.2026 Gunjan-

Subhash Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Sao Vs State of Jharkhand

Habib Momin Vs the State of Jharkhand

Lalmuni Devi Vs State of Jharkhand

Feku Bhuiyan @ Sarvanash Ji Vs State of Jharkhand

Mithilesh Yadav @ Mithilesh Kumar Vs State of Jharkhand

Umesh Das Vs the State of Jharkhand