Justice Rajesh Kumar granted permission to the applicant to withdraw the bail application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn with no objection from the State.
Permission granted for withdrawal; bail application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:27367
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3688 of 2026
Vikash Ganjhu @ Dashrath Ganjhu, aged about 41 years, Son of Late Ramdeo Ganjhu, resident of Village Ekta, P.O. & P.S. Kunda, District Chatra (Jharkhand)
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Harsh Vardhan, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P.
05/Dated: 11th September, 2026
1. On the instruction of his client, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.
2. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.
3. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the present bail application stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Dated 11th September, 2026 Raja/Uploaded
Vikash Ganjhu @ Dashrath Ganjhu
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
