Allowed

Tajmul Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 May 2026B.A./2759/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to the petitioner in a cybercrime case pending before Additional Sessions Judge-II. The Court allowed the application on the merit of parity with a coordinate bench that granted bail to a co-accused on similar facts.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount on conditions of attendance and cooperation.

Tajmul Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:JHHC:14050

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

B.A. No.2759 of 2026

¶4

¶5

Tajmul Ansari, son of Shahadat Ansari @ Mian, resident of Dudhani, PO Karanjo, PS Margomunda, District Deoghar … Petitioner(s). Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s).

¶7

CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. -----For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP …......

¶8

04 /11.05.2026: This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008.

¶9

2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order.

¶10

3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 4. Though there are material evidence against the petitioner being involved in the cybercrime as his mobile number is linked with the money transaction yet exactly similarly situated co-accused has been granted benefit of bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court in BA No. 11545 of 2025. The petitioner is also in custody from the same date which the co-accused was i.e. 15.09.2025. The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent.

¶11

5. Since the allegation and the evidence against the petitioner and co-accused is exactly the same, only for the sake of parity, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on the same condition. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is

¶12

¶13

2026:JHHC:14050

¶14

directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cybercrime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 130 of 2025 subject to the conditions that:-

¶15

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

¶16

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

¶17

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

¶18

(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

¶19

6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed.

¶20

(ANANDA SEN, J.)

¶21

11.05.2026 Tanuj/CP-3

¶22

Uploaded on 11.05.2026

¶23

Tajmul Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tajmul Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs Gurmeet Kaur

Dinesh Hazam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sarwari Khatun Vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Sucheta Ghosh Vs the State of Jharkhand Theough Its Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand

Bharat Engineering and Body Building Co. Pvt. Ltd. through Krishna Bhalotia Vs State of Jharkhand

Gopal Kumar Dutta Vs the State of Jharkhand