Bail application under Sections 483 & 484 BNSS for offence under Section 22(c) NDPS Act and Section 27(b)(ii) Drugs and Cosmetics Act after recovery of prohibited medicines. The court declined bail at this stage and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:JHHC:6057
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1076 of 2026
Md. Mustak, S/o Md. Suleman, R/o Mandai Kalan, Madarsha, P.O. & P.S. Lohsinghna, District- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s).
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shreshta, Spl. P.P.
02/ 09.03.2026: This bail application has been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as he is in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 22© NDPS Act and 27(b)(ii) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
09th March, 2026 R.S./ Uploaded on 09 /03/2026
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner facing NDPS and Drugs and Cosmetics Act charges after recovery of prohibited medicines.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Md. Mustak
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
