Dismissed¶20

Sunil Kumar Ajmani Alias Sunil Ajmani v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC17 Mar 2025WPC/464/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi — W.P.(C) No.464 of 2025; Sunil Kumar Ajmani @ Sunil Ajmani & Harmendra Pal Ajmani @ Herman Ajmani @ Titu Ajmani v. State of Jharkhand, Deputy Commissioner Koderma, Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-House Rent Controller Koderma, Mahabir Pandit & Dr. Naresh Kumar Pandit; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on unopposed prayer of counsel (17.03.2025); bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Shankar; pending interlocutory application(s) also dismissed; no merits or substantive issue decided.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the prayer of the petitioners' counsel, with no objection from counsel for the respondents; pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also dismissed. ¶20

Sunil Kumar Ajmani Alias Sunil Ajmani Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.464 of 2025

¶2

¶3

Sunil Kumar Ajmani @ Sunil Ajmani, aged about 40 years, son of Late Rajendra Ajmani, resident of Bharaich Building, in front of Koderma Railway Station, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma (Jharkhand).

¶4

Harmendra Pal Ajmani @ Herman Ajmani @ Titu Ajmani, aged about 55 years, son of Kasturi Lal Ajmani, resident of Bharaich Building, in front of Koderma Railway Station, Jhumri Telaiya, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma (Jharkhand). .......... Petitioners.

¶5

-Versus-

¶6

The State of Jharkhand.

¶7

The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma.

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-House Rent Controller, Koderma.

¶9

Mahabir Pandit, son of Late Akal Pandit, resident of Gaushala Road, Ward No.27, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma (Jharkhand).

¶10

Dr. Naresh Kumar Pandit, son of Sri Mahabir Pandit, resident of Gaushala Road, Ward No.27, P.O. Jhumri Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District Koderma (Jharkhand). .......... Respondents.

¶11

¶12

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶13

¶14

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sagar, A.C. to

¶15

Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Res. Nos.1 to 3: Ms. Rishi Bharti, A.C. to A.A.G.-III For the Res. Nos.4 & 5 : Mr. Rajendra Krishna, Advocate

¶16

¶17

Order No.06 Date: 17.03.2025

¶18

Mr. Sagar, learned A.C. to Mr. Indrajit Sinha, counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition.

¶19

Ms. Rishi Bharti, learned A.C. to A.A.G.-III appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.4 and 5 have no objection to the said prayer.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid prayer, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is also dismissed accordingly.

¶22

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶23

Rohit /

¶24

-2-

¶25

W.P.(C) No.464 of 2025

Sunil Kumar Ajmani Alias Sunil Ajmani v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Ajmani Alias Sunil Ajmani v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanaujiya Devi Vs the Union of India

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Represented Thro Its Authorised Representative Mr. Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs Damodar Valley Corporation Represented through Its Managing Director

Dhruv Narayan Singh Vs State of Jharkhand

Nirmal Kachhap Alias Nirmal Munda Vs State of Jharkhand, through Secretary, Land and Revenue Department

Anita Rampal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Principal Giridih College Namely Samir Sarkar Vs State of Jharkhand