Dismissed¶¶26

Charlis Soren v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC6 Aug 2025WPC/3183/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue statutory remedy — injunction sought under Code of Civil Procedure in pending declaratory suit for declaration of right and title over land in question; Charlis Soren v. The State of Jharkhand, Deputy Commissioner/SDO/Circle Officer/District Mining Officer Pakur, Charan Kisku, Ganjel Kisku, Hopan Babu Kisku and M/s C.B. Stone Company (Proprietor Jitu Bellani); Pakur, Jharkhand; neutral citation 2025:JHHC:22016-DB; decided 06-08-2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the statute, i.e., the Code of Civil Procedure, including seeking appropriate injunction in the pending declaratory suit. ¶¶26

Charlis Soren Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:JHHC:22016-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3183 of 2025

¶3

-----

¶4

Charlis Soren, aged about 65 years, Son of Late Rengta Anthony Soren, Resident of Village- Ramnathpur, Post Office- Malpahari, Police Station- Malpahari (O.P.), District- Pakur, Jharkhand

¶5

… … … Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand

¶8

The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, Post Office and Police StationPakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Pakur, Post Office and Police StationPakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand

¶10

The Circle Officer Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.

¶11

The District Mining Officer, Pakur, Post Office and Police StationPakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.

¶12

Charan Kisku, Son of Late Dhanai Kisku, Resident of villageRamnathpur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur Malpahari (O.P), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.

¶13

Ganjel Kisku, Son of Late Dhanai Kisku, Resident of villageRamnathpur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur Malpahari (O.P), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.

¶14

Hopan Babu Kisku, Son of Late Dhenai Kisku, Resident of Village – Ramnathput, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station- Pakur Malpahari (O.P.), District- Pakur, Jharkhand

¶15

M/s C.B. Stone Company represented through Proprietor Jitu Bellani Son of Late Parshuram Bellani, Resident of MohallaSindhipara, Pakur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur(T), District-Pakur, Jharkhand. … … … Respondents

¶16

¶17

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

¶18

------For the Petitioner :Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents :Mrs. Sunita Kumari, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-II ------

¶19

Order No.04 / Dated 06^th August, 2025

¶20

1. Learned counsel appearing for the writ-petitioner submits that, in view of the fact that a declaratory suit has already been instituted seeking declaration of right and title over the land in question, she may be allowed to withdraw the present writ

¶21

Page 1

¶22

2025:JHHC:22016-DB

¶23

petition in order to avail the remedy available under the Code of Civil Procedure for seeking appropriate injunction in the pending suit.

¶24

2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the said prayer.

¶25

3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the statute.

¶26

4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, and as such, stands disposed of.

¶27

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶28

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

¶29

Umesh/Abhishek

¶30

Page 2

Charlis Soren v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Charlis Soren v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through Mines Commissioner

M/S Narayan Stone Works through His Proprietor Sri Vikash Chandra Vs the State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Industries Mines and Geology

Industries and Commerce Association through Its President Baidya Nath Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Department of Mines and Geology

Subodh Kumar Singh Vs Pushpa Devi

Zahiruddin Ansari Vs Salma Parween

Anil Kumar Mehta Vs the State of Jharkhand