Dismissed¶15
East India Udyog Limited through Sri Pankaj Kumar v. Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited through Its Managing Director
Jharkhand HCWPC/281/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
East India Udyog Limited vs Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (JUVNL); W.P.(C) No. 281 of 2019; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; neutral identifier 2025:JHHC:12003-DB; decided 23.04.2025 by Division Bench (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J. and Rajesh Shankar, J.). Two-line final order: writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the statement of petitioner's counsel that it had become infructuous. Respondents include the Managing Director, Chief Engineer (RE) and General Manager (APDRP) of JBVNL. No merits adjudication, no impugned order described, no cases or sections relied on, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, counsel for the petitioner having stated that it has become infructuous. ¶15