Allowed¶13
Sudip Banerjee v. Pradip Kr Mullick
Jharkhand HCSA/431/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Jharkhand High Court; S.A. No. 431 of 2018; Sudip Banerjee v. Pradip Kr. Mullick; correction of typographical error in cause title of final judgment dated 16.01.2025; appellant No. 2 Ashok Kumar Banerjee wrongly shown as dead; order dated 07.08.2024 related only to appellant No. 1 Deb Kumar Banerjee (shown dead and substituted); office-initiated listing; correction carried out by office; copy communicated through FAX; Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
What did the court decide?
Deletion of the words “(dead vide order dated 07.08.2024)” concerning appellant No. 2 from the cause title of the final judgment dated 16.01.2025; office directed to carry out the correction and to communicate a copy of this order to the concerned court through ‘FAX’. ¶13