Dismissed¶22

Kedar Prasad v. Churaman Das Bhadani

Jharkhand HC15 Dec 2025SA/106/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court Ranchi; S.A. 106 of 2006; second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution (ex parte, no appearance by appellant or counsel); interim order vacated; IA dismissed as not pressed; appellant Kedar Prasad v. heirs of Churaman Das Bhadani; underlying dispute: eviction following Title Appeal No. 57 of 1983 (allowed 16.02.2006 by ADJ Fast Track Court-I, Giridih) reversing trial court decree dated 24.08.1983 in Title Suit No. 56 of 1977/8 of 1983 (Additional Subordinate Judge, Giridih); substitution order dated 20.11.2019; appeal admitted 06.12.2007; adjournment cost Rs. 1,000; bench: Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary; decision date 15.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim order vacated; pending interlocutory application, if any, dismissed as not pressed; no substantive relief considered on merits. ¶22

Kedar Prasad Vs Churaman Das Bhadani — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:JHHC:37633

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

S.A. No. 106 of 2006

¶4

Kedar Prasad, son of Badri Narayan Prasad, resident of Giridih Town, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih, District- Giridih.

¶5

… … Defendant/Respondent/Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Churaman Das Bhadani (dead and substituted vide order dated 20.11.2019)

¶8

(i) Sheo Shankar Das Bhadani

¶9

(ii) Ashok Das Bhadani

¶10

(iii) Kishore Das Bhadani All Sons of Late Churaman Das Bhadani Resident of Village – Giridih Town, P.O. + P.S.- Giridih, DistrictGiridih … … Plaintiffs/Appellants/Respondents

¶11

¶12

CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

¶13

¶14

For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : None

¶15

¶16

20 /15.12.2025 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant.

¶17

2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 16.02.2006 (decree signed on 03.03.2006) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Giridih in Title Appeal No. 57 of 1983 whereby the appeal was allowed and judgment and decree dated 24.08.1983 (decree signed on 01.09.1983) passed by learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Giridih in Title Suit No. 56 of 1977/ 8 of 1983 has been set-aside.

¶18

3. The suit was dismissed and the appeal was allowed. Consequently, the order of eviction was passed. This appeal was admitted on 06.12.2007.

¶19

4. Today, when the case is taken up, nobody is appearing on behalf of the appellant and no advance notice seeking adjournment has been circulated.

¶20

5. On 16.06.2022, the case was adjourned by way of last chance. Thereafter, on 18.08.2022, the case was adjourned upon payment of cost of Rs. 1,000/-. Thereafter, again the case was adjourned at the instance of the appellant.

¶21

2025:JHHC:37633

¶22

6. Since nobody is appearing on behalf of the appellant, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶23

7. Interim order is vacated.

¶24

8. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed.

¶25

9. Let the records received from the learned Courts concerned be sent back forthwith.

¶26

10. Let this order be communicated to the learned Court concerned through ‘FAX/email’.