Review petition of 2020 dismissed for non-prosecution as defects remained unremoved despite repeated time and no one appeared for the petitioner. Counsel's later explanation that another counsel was to be engaged did not persuade the Court to alter the dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:JHHC:17856-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.37 of 2020
-----
Both resident of Chaichapra, P.O. Suremanpur, P.S. Baria, District Balia (U.P).
… … Appellants/Petitioners Versus
… … Respondents/Respondents
------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : None
Order No. 05 / Dated 4th July, 2025
1
2025:JHHC:17856-DB
the matter has been listed before this Court under the heading for “Orders(with defect)”.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Later on
2
2025:JHHC:17856-DB
rather, he has been informed not to appear since another counsel will be engaged.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Birendra/
3
Saraswati Devi
Satendra Dhibar
Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director
The Director (Personnel), Bharat Coking Coal Limited
The Chief Personal Manager (MP & IR), Bharat Coking Coal Limited
The Project Officer, Govindpur Colliery, Area No.3, Bharat Coking Coal Limited
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
