Dismissed¶22

The Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand v. Devendra Kumar Sinha

Jharkhand HC10 Nov 2025LPA/89/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal by State appellant (Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand) in L.P.A. No. 89 of 2025; respondent no. 1 (Devendra Kumar Sinha) gave no objection; appeal dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to I.A. No. 14690 of 2025; pending applications disposed of; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; coram Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar; Order No. 03 dated 10.11.2025; procedural disposal only, no statutory or precedent citations.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the appellant to withdraw L.P.A. No. 89 of 2025; the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶22

The Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Jharkhand Vs Devendra Kumar Sinha — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

 2025:JHHC:33524-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

L.P.A. No. 89 of 2025

¶4

The Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi … … Appellant

¶5

… … Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Devendra Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Madho Prasad Singh, R/o Shiv Bhawan Lane, Tagore Hill Road, PO & PS-Bariatu, Ranchi

¶8

The Secretary, Dept. of Water Resources, Govt. of Jharkhand

¶9

The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi ... ... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶11

For the Appellant : Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V Mr. Neil Abhijit Toppo, AC to GA-V For the Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Sunil Kumar Ganjhoo, Advocate Mr. Yash Harsh Vardhan, Advocate Ms. Diksha Dwivedi, Advocate Ms. Kanak Kumari, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Goel, Advocate Order No. 03 Dated: 10.11.2025

¶12

I.A. No. 14690 of 2025

¶13

The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of

¶14

the appellant seeking withdrawal of the instant appeal.

¶15

2. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 has no objection.

¶16

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons

¶17

stated in the present interlocutory application, the appellant is permitted