Dismissed¶15

Mr Pradhan Yadav v. Mrs Sandhya Devi

Jharkhand HC9 Jun 2025FA/112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi; First Appeal No.112 of 2024; neutral citation 2025:JHHC:14746-DB; order dated 09.06.2025; Coram: Sujit Narayan Prasad and Rajesh Kumar, JJ. Appellant Pradhan Yadav (counsel Indu Shekhar Gupta) sought and obtained leave to withdraw the first appeal against respondent Sandhya Devi (counsel Onkar Nath Tiwary); appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No statute or precedent cited, no issue framed, no holding recorded — withdrawal/dismissal only; not citable for any legal proposition.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the first appeal was granted and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶15

Mr Pradhan Yadav Vs Mrs Sandhya Devi — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:JHHC:14746-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No.112 of 2024

¶3

------

¶4

Mr. Pradhan Yadav, aged about-47 years, son of Joyadhar Yadav, resident of Village-Sejapahaari, P.O.-Heath Manjhiandih, P.S.-Jama, District-Dumka (Jharkhand). …. …. Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Mrs. Sandhya Devi, wife of Pradhan Yadav, D/O-Late Jogay Mahto, aged about-43 years, resident of Village-Sejapahari, P.O. Heth Manjiandih, P.S.-Jama, District-Dumka permanent address resident of Village-Bilkandi, P.O. Bilkandi, P.S.-Tongra, District-Dumka

¶7

.... .... Respondent

¶8

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶9

------ For the Appellant : Mr. Indu Shekhar Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Onkar Nath Tiwary, Advocate

¶10

------

¶11

07/Dated: 09.06.2025

¶12

1. In pursuant to the notice issued by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.02.2025, appearance has been made on behalf of the respondent.

¶13

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard on merit at this stage.

¶14

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal.

¶15

4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶17

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶18

Rohit/-