Dismissed

Bhanu Alias Bharat Lal Singh @ Bhanu Singh Kharwar @ Bhanu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC18 Aug 2025Cr.A(DB)/1585/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal against the rejection of regular bail in an NIA case, the prosecution evidence had already closed. The appellant withdrew the appeal, and the court dismissed it, directing the trial court to conclude the trial without delay.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; trial court directed to conclude trial without unnecessary delay.

Bhanu Alias Bharat Lal Singh @ Bhanu Singh… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Jharkhand HC (2025)

¶1

2025:JHHC:24135-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB). No. 1585 of 2024

¶3

-----

¶4

Bhanu @ Bharat Lal Singh @ Bhanu Singh Kharwar @ Bhanu Singh, aged about 38 years, son of Ramdhani Singh, resident of village Palhe, P.O. and P.S. Chiniya, District Garhwa, Jharkhand.

¶5

… … … Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand … … … Respondent -------

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

¶9

------For the Appellant :Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. ------

¶10

Order No.07 / Dated 18^th August, 2025

¶11

1. The appeal has been filed under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 directed against the order dated 03.10.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 1086 of 2024 by Additional Sessions Judge- II, Garhwa whereby and whereunder the prayer for regular of the appellant has been rejected.

¶12

2. The matter was heard by this Court on 25^th June, 2025 calling upon the fresh status report of the case.

¶13

3. Therefore, fresh status, as available in Flag “Y”, it is evident there from that the prosecution evidence has already been closed.

¶14

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that the case is to go under the stage of recording of the statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. He has submitted that since the prosecution is taking consistent steps to conclude the trial and as such, at this stage the appellant may not be allowed to release on bail. He has further submitted that all necessary steps also be

¶15

Page 1

¶16

2025:JHHC:24135-DB

¶17

taken to ensure that the trial is concluded without any unnecessary delay

¶18

6. Upon this, Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, has submitted that considering the said undertaking furnished by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, he does not intend to press the instant appeal.

¶19

7. the instant is dismissed as Accordingly, appeal withdrawn and as such disposed of in view of the fact that the prosecution evidence has already been closed.

¶20

9. It is expected that the learned trial court shall conclude the trial expeditiously without granting any unnecessary adjournments.

¶21

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶22

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

¶23

Umesh/Abhishek

¶24

Page 2

Bhanu Alias Bharat Lal Singh @ Bhanu Singh Kharwar @ Bhanu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhanu Alias Bharat Lal Singh @ Bhanu Singh Kharwar @ Bhanu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Premium Infra Logistics Private Limited through Its Authorized Signatory Aswini Majhi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shailesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Smt Pushpa Gouri Vyas Vs the State of Jharkhand

Hindalco Industries Limited through Its Authorized Signatory Vijay Kant Dubey Vs the State of Jharkhand through Secretary Mines and Geology

Mandhan Minerals Corporation through Its Partner Namely Anil Tanwani Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

M/S Maa Durga Stone Works through Its Proprietor Soumitro Ghosh Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology