Petitioner sought extension of the surrender period fixed in his anticipatory bail order, citing typhoid illness. The court extended the surrender period by ten working days and kept the remaining bail order intact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:11063 )
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 885 of 2025
-----
Manas Ranjan Nayak, Aged about – 38 years, S/o Prasanna Kumar Nayak, R/o Village – Bamara, Govindpur, P.O. – Govindpur, P.S. – Govindpur, District – Sambalpur, Orissa.
… … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … … Respondent
------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
------For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. ------
Order No. 04 / Dated 11th April, 2025
The instant Cr.M.P. has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for extension of time/modification of the order dated 17.10.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 6370 of 2024.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:11063 )
concerned within ten working days from today and remaining part of the order dated 17.10.2024 passed in A.B.A. No. 6370 of 2024 shall remain intact.
( Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Umesh /Abhishek
1 issue framed by the court
Should the time allowed for surrender under the anticipatory bail order dated 17.10.2024 be extended on grounds of petitioner's medical illness?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manas Ranjan Nayak
The State of Jharkhand
Arun Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
