Disposed¶18

Summi Sinha Alias Sumita v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC12 Sept 2025Cr.M.P./585/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi, Cr.M.P. No.585 of 2025, Order No.03 dated 12-09-2025, Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. Restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.11.2024 (requisites within four weeks); laches of clerk; State raised no serious objection; restoration at the same stage; listing after a week. Petitioner: Summi Sinha @ Sumita; Opposite Parties: State of Jharkhand and Tanvi Komal.

What did the court decide?

Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal; Registry directed to list it before the concerned Bench after a week; the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition disposed of accordingly. ¶18

Summi Sinha Alias Sumita Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

( 2025:JHHC:28035 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.585 of 2025

¶2

Summi Sinha @ Sumita aged about 48 years wife of Late Mukesh Sinha, resident of Saya Niwas, New Bus Stand Road, Near Petrol Pump, P.O. & P.S.-Giridih, District Giridih.

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

Tanvi Komal wife of Late Kumar Gaurav, Resident of Bakshidid Road, Bustand & P.O.-Giridih, P.S.-Giridih Sadar, District Giridih.

¶7

… Opposite Parties ------

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶9

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P.

¶10

------

¶11

Order No:-03 Dated:-12-09-2025

¶12

Heard the parties.

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.11.2024.

¶14

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.11.2024 for filing the requisites within four weeks. It is next submitted that due to laches on the part of his clerk, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not file the said requisites within the stipulated time ; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.11.2024. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 12.11.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 be restored to its original file.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

¶17

Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3041 of 2024 before the concerned Bench after a week.

¶18

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶19

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶20

Abhiraj/

Summi Sinha Alias Sumita v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Summi Sinha Alias Sumita v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dasuva Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Karan Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Surendra Kumar Manjhi Alias Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ravindar Kumar Alias Ravindra Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Smt Bela Sinha Vs State of Jharkhand

M/S Good Books Educational Trust through Its General Manager Pravir James Simes Vs Dayamani Kombol Baha