Dismissed¶22

Vina Devi Alias Beena Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC17 Feb 2025W.P.(Cr.)/552/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi; W.P. (Cr). No.552 of 2023; Order No.07 dated 17/02/2025; Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.; writ petition (criminal) dismissed as withdrawn; Final Form submitted, petitioner not sent up for trial; liberty to file fresh application if cause of action arises; petitioners led by Vina Devi @ Beena Devi et al.; respondents: State of Jharkhand and Kavita Kumari; counsel: Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar (petitioners), Mr. Rajesh Kumar (OP2).

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh application if any cause of action arises. ¶22

Vina Devi Alias Beena Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr). No.552 of 2023

¶2

------

¶3

Vina Devi @ Beena Devi, aged about 58 years, wife of Karmu Ram, Resident of Kumhar Toli, Lohardaga Road, P.O. and P.S. Gumla, District Gumla;

¶4

Karmu Ram, aged about 66 years, son of Late Bandhan Ram, Resident of Kumhar Toli, Lohardaga Road, P.O. and P.S. Gumla; District Gumla,

¶5

Ruchi Kumari, aged about 30 years, daughter of Karmu Ram, Resident of Kumhar Toli, Lohardaga Road, P.S. and P.O. Gumla, District Gumla;

¶6

Sima Lata years, @ Seema Lata, 39 aged about wife of Pancham Ram, Resident of BID, Prem Nagar, Ward No. 19, Badla, P.O. and P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga;

¶7

Swati Lata, aged about 27 years, wife of Nanddeo Ram, Resident of Bhusur, Zalim Kalan, P.O. and P.S. Latehar, District Latehar;

¶8

Pancham Ram, aged about 42 years, son of Late Jalsu Ram, Resident of BID, Prem Nagar, Ward No. 19, Badla, P.O. and P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga;

¶9

Gopichand @ Gopi Chand, aged about 34 years, son of Prasad Ram, Resident of Mahabir Mandir, Ambedkar Nagar, Tanki Side, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi;

¶10

Nand Dev Ram @ Nanddeo Ram, aged about 43 years, son of Mahesh Ram, Resident of Village Bhusur, Jalim, P.O. and P.S. Latehar, District Latehar.

¶11

.... .... …. Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State of Jharkhand

¶14

Kavita Kumari, daughter of Nand Kishore Das, resident of S2, Amar Enclave, Prakash Nagar, Birsanagar, P.O. and P.S.Birsanagar, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbum.

¶15

.... .... .... Respondents

¶16

-----CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶17

For the Petitioners : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate For the OP2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate ------

¶18

Order No.07 Dated- 17/02/2025

¶19

Heard the parties.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition as the Final Form has been submitted in that case and the petitioner has not been sent up for trial; with liberty to file a fresh application, if any, cause of action arises.

¶21

Permission is accorded.

¶22

This writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid

¶23

liberty.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶25

Abhiraj/

Vina Devi Alias Beena Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vina Devi Alias Beena Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Mukhtar Alias Gajni Ansari Alias MD Mukhtar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rahul Kumar Soni Alias Rahul Soni Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Shahjahan Alias MD Sahwawj Vs the State of Jharkhand

Niranjan Sautar Alias Niranjan Sutar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shrish Chandra Dubey Alias Shishir Dubey Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manish Kumar Sinha Vs the State of Jharkhand