Dismissed¶21

Mukul Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Mar 2025W.P.(Cr.)/22/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of a criminal writ petition for non-prosecution due to petitioner's absence; W.P. (Cr.) No. 22 of 2024; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary; respondent counsel Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III; decision date 11.03.2025; no merits, statute or precedent adjudicated; relevant only as an instance of default dismissal for want of prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mukul Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P. (Cr.) No. 22 of 2024

¶3

Mukul Kumar, Aged about 25 years, son of late Ram Bachan Prasad, Resident of Sita Lal Gali, Deo, P.O. & P.S. Deo, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar). Presently residing at Flat No. 1 "D", Block "B", Arihant Residency, Chesire Home Road, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi. … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶7

Additional Director General of Police, CID/Vigilance, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Doranda, PO & P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi.

¶8

Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Region, Govt of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶9

Deputy Inspector General of Police, South Chotanagpur Region, Govt. of Jharkhand having office at Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶10

Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi having office at Administrative Building, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O, P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶11

Superintendent of Police (City), Ranchi having office at Administrative Building, Kutchery Road, P.O. G.P.O., P.S Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶12

Officer Incharge, Bariatu Police Station, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi.

¶13

Sri Suresh Kumar Mandal, son of not known to the petitioner. Presently working as Officer Incharge, Bariatu Police Station, Bariatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi.

¶14

Sri Satish Gupta, son of not known to the petitioner, Sub Inspector of Police, Bariatu Police Station, Bariatu, P.O. & P.S. Bariatu, District-Ranchi.

¶15

… Respondents

¶16

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶17

For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondent : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III

¶18

05 / 11.03.2025

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the Respondent but no one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.

¶20

Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that there is no merit in this petition hence the petitioner is not diligent in pursuing this writ petition.

¶21

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶22

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶23

Smita/-

Mukul Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mukul Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sanjeev Nayan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pappu Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Abdul Rashid Alias Abdul Rashid Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Saw Alias Manoj Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sahil Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand