Dismissed¶¶21

MD Naushad Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 Jan 2025Cr.M.P./1891/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous | Cr.M.P. No.1891 of 2023 | High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi | Md. Naushad Alam @ Naushad Alam and 7 others v. The State of Jharkhand and Guliram Begam | underlying Complaint Case No. 1606 of 2018 already disposed of | withdrawal sought by petitioners' counsel (Kamdeo Pandey), no objection by State (Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P.) | decided 02.01.2025 by Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed as infructuous, the learned counsel for the State having raised no objection to its withdrawal. ¶¶21

MD Naushad Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

Cr.M.P. No.1891 of 2023

¶3

Md. Naushad Alam @ Naushad Alam, aged about 51 years, son of Late Abdul Kaiyum.

¶4

Md. Samshad Alam @ Shamshad Alam @ Feroz Alam aged about 34 years, son of Late Abdul Kaiyum

¶5

Aftaf Alam @ Irshad Alam, aged about 30 years, son of late Abdul Kaiyum,

¶6

Shagufta Ali @ Nily Perween, aged about 28 years, wife of Naushad Alam.

¶7

Husn Aara, aged about 67 years, wife of late Abdul kaiyum,

¶8

Ruby Perween @ Ruby aged about 25 years, Daughter of late Abdul Kaiyum.

¶9

All are residents of Village- Fusro, Sharma Colony, Juta Bhandar, P.O. & P.S.- Fusro, District- Bokaro

¶10

Chand Perween @ Chand aged about 30 years, Wife of Dr. Samserja, Resident of – Chandwa Toli, P.O. & P.S.- Chandwa, District-Latehar.

¶11

Sabnam Perween @ Subnam Perween aged about 27 years, Wife of Raja @ Najrul, Resident of Gaddi Muhalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih.

¶12

… Petitioners

¶13

The State of Jharkhand

¶14

Guliram Begam, Daughter of Mehdi Imam, Wife of Samshad Alam @ Feroz Alam, Resident of Village- Fusro, Sharma Colony, Juta Bhandar, P.O. & P.S.- Fusro, District- Bokaro, presently residing at Village- Mohlichuwa, Near Imambada, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. … Opposite Parties

¶15

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶16

For the Petitioners : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Naresh PD Thakur, Adv.

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

Order No.07/Dated- 02.01.2025

¶19

On call, learned counsel for the petitioners appeared and submitted that Complaint Case No. 1606 of 2018 has already been disposed of. Therefore, he desires to withdraw this case which has become infructuous.

¶20

There is no objection raised on behalf of the learned counsel for the State.

¶21

Hence, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶22

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶23

Amar/-

¶24

Page 2 of 2

MD Naushad Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

MD Naushad Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Bouri Vs State of Jharkhand

Bhola Rawani Vs State of Jharkhand

Rajdeo Choudhary And Ors. Vs State of Jharkhand

Amardeep Murmu Alias Somay Murmu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sumit Kumar Mittal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ishrat Zabin Vs the State of Jharkhand