Disposed¶15

Debjyoti Biswas v. the State Ofjharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Jul 2025Cr.M.P./1554/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Jharkhand High Court at Ranchi; Cr.M.P. No.1554 of 2025; Debjoyti Biswas (Shree Ganesh Enterprises) v. State of Jharkhand; restoration of case dismissed for non-prosecution; A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024; anticipatory bail application; counsel absent due to facial infections; non-prosecution neither deliberate nor intentional; no serious objection by Addl.P.P.; restored to original file at same stage; listing before concerned Bench after a week; Order No.03 dated 11-07-2025; Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary; disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 to its original file at the same stage, with a direction to the Registry to list it before the concerned Bench after a week. ¶15

Debjyoti Biswas Vs the State Ofjharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:JHHC:18878] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1554 of 2025

¶2

Debjoyti Biswas, Proprietor of Shree Ganesh Enterprises, S/o- Dulal Chandra Biswan, aged about 28 years, Resident of Ghoshpara, 4 No. Ward, Kalyani, P.O. + P.S.- Kalyani, District- Nadia (West Bengal), Aadhar No.669161876805 … Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

… The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party

¶5

-----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek S. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P. ------

¶7

Order No:-03 Dated:-11-07-2025

¶8

Heard the parties.

¶9

This miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 its original file which stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.01.2025.

¶10

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 stood dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.01.2025 by this Court. It is next submitted that as the counsel for the petitioner was suffering from facial infections, hence, no one appeared before this Court when the said A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 was called out resulting in dismissal of the said A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that non-prosecution before this Court on 08.01.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 be restored to its original file.

¶11

Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.

¶12

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

¶13

Registry is directed to list A.B.A. (Filling) No.19352 of 2024 before the

¶14

concerned Bench after a week.

¶15

This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Animesh/

Debjyoti Biswas v. the State Ofjharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Debjyoti Biswas v. the State Ofjharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Chandra Sharma Alias Mahesh Chandra Sahstri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ritesh Kumar Singh Vs State of Jharkhand

Manjulata Toppo Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kundan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dr Vijay Sharma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajendra Prasad Sah Vs the State of Jharkhand