Disposed¶19

Rohit Goyal v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC12 Dec 2025Cr.M.P./1097/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Restoration of writ petition dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order; cost deposit of Rs.1,000 with JHALSA; W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023; Cr.M.P. No.1097 of 2025; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary; inadvertent non-compliance neither deliberate nor intentional; restored to original file at same stage; Registry to list before concerned Bench after a week; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 to its original file at the same stage at which it stood before its dismissal, with the Registry directed to list it before the concerned Bench after a week. ¶19

Rohit Goyal Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:JHHC:37450] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1097 of 2025

¶2

Rohit Goyal, aged about 34 years, son of Sri Binod Kumar Goyal, resident of Naya Bazaar, D.B. Road, Jugsalai, P.O. & P.S.- Jugsalai, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

Raj Kumar Singh, son of Late Prabhunath Kapildeo, Assistant General Manager, Small Industries Development Bank India, resident of Flat No.2-C, Samridhhi Complex, South Office Para, near FIIT JEE, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi … (Jharkhand) Opposite Parties

¶7

------

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶9

For the Petitioner	: Mr. Anurag Kumar, Advocate
	Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate
	Mr. Dhruwa Kumar, Advocate
For the State	: Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III
For the O.P. No.2	: Mr. Paveen Jaiswal, Advocate

¶10

------

¶11

Order No:-04 Dated:-12-12-2025

¶12

Heard the parties.

¶13

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.02.2025 passed by this Court.

¶14

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 05.02.2025 passed by this Court to file the proof of deposit of Rs.1,000/with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA). It is next submitted that due to inadvertence, the said amount could not be deposited within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated

¶15

05.02.2025 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 05.02.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is further submitted that the said cost has already been deposited. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 be restored to its original file.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 have not raised any serious objection.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

¶18

Registry is directed to list W.P. (Cr.) No.616 of 2023 before the concerned Bench after a week.

¶19

This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶21

Dated- 12.12.2025-Animesh/

Rohit Goyal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Goyal v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Arun Kumar Alias Arun Kumar Subramanium Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vikas Jain Alias Vikash Kumar Jain Alias Vikash Jain Vs the State of Jharkhand

M/S Jharkhand Education Development Trust through Its Director Namely MD Rafique Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Urban Development and Housing

MD Farukh Ansari Alias MD Farooque Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chaturbhuj Mondal Vs Bela Mandalain Alias Bela Devi