Disposed¶18

Ramanuj Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC14 Aug 2025Cont.(Cvl)/753/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt (civil) compliance disposal; underlying judgment dated 19.09.2024 in W.P.(S) No. 983 of 2021; compliance documents Notification 06.06.2025 (Annexure-A), Letter 13.06.2025 (Annexure-B), Letter 17.07.2025 (Annexure-C); Rural Works Department; Water Resources Department; Hazaribagh; petitioner absent on consecutive listings; case dropped against opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and disposed; Justice Sanjay Prasad; 14.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings dropped against opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and the case disposed of. ¶18

Ramanuj Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 753 of 2025

¶2

….

¶3

Ramanuj Singh, aged about 72 years, son of Late Sita Ram Singh, resident of House No. 101, Siv Tripuati Apartment, Amathia Nagar, PO and PS- Namkum, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand …… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand

¶6

Sri. K. Shrivasan, S/o not known the Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at FFP Building, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand

¶7

Sri Ranjit Ranjan Prasad, S/o not known, the Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at FFP Building, PO and PS-Dhurwa, DistrictRanchi, Jharkhand

¶8

Sri Prashant Kumar S/o not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO and PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand …Opp. Parties

¶9

-----

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

¶11

-----

¶12

For the Petitioner : None. For the State : Mr. Vineet Prakash, AC to SC-IV

¶13

05/14.08.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner today. However, learned counsel for the State is present. Yesterday also the case was listed, but none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the judgment dated 19.09.2024 passed in W. P. (S) No. 983 of 2021 by this Court has been complied by the opposite parties and admitted dues have been paid to the petitioner vide Notification dated 06.06.2025, (Annexure-A) issued by Joint Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand and Letter dated 13.06.2025, (Annexure-B) issued by Joint Secretary, Rural

¶15

¶16

Works Department, Government of Jharkhand and also Letter dated 17.07.2025 issued by the Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Hazaribagh, (Annexure-C).

¶17

Thus, this Court finds that the opposite parties have complied with the Judgement passed by this Court.

¶18

Accordingly, Cont. Case (Civil) No. 753 of 2025 is dropped against the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and disposed of.

¶19

(Sanjay Prasad, J.)

¶20

Kamlesh/

¶21

Ramanuj Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramanuj Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mausam Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sahil Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Irfan Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prakash Rai And Anr. Vs State of Jharkhand

Shankar Rabidas Vs State of Jharkhand

Hotel Birsa Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Prem Rajesh Soy Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner