Praduman Tiwary v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Dec 2025CONT.APP./2/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Praduman Tiwary vs The State of Jharkhand and others (Sri Satyendra Kumar; Sri Rajnish Singh; Smt. Preeti Kisko; Sri S. Siddharth); Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supply Corporation (JSFC); Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation; contempt appeal; maintainability concession; withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings; pending applications disposed; dismissed 15.12.2025; Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.; Rajesh Shankar, J.; Neutral Citation 2025:JHHC:37601-DB.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the appeal and to file appropriate proceedings; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶para 3 (¶21)

Praduman Tiwary Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. 2025:JHHC:37601-DB

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

Cont. Appeal (Civil) No. 02 of 2025

¶4

Praduman Tiwary son of late Jugan Tiwary, aged about 64 years, resident of Gyatri Mundir, Survinagar, Sudna, P.O Sudna, P.S. Daltonganj, DistrictPalamau.

¶5

... Petitioner/Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Jharkhand

¶8

Sri Satyendra Kumar, the Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director, Kadru Office, P.O and P.S. Kadru, Ranchi.

¶9

Sri Rajnish Singh, the General Manager, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director, Kadru Office, P.O and P.S. Kadru, Ranchi.

¶10

Smt. Preeti Kisko, the District Manager, Palamau, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, P.O and P.S. Daltonganj, Palamau.

¶11

Sri S. Siddharth, the Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, office at Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Rajpath, R- Block, Road No.2, P.O. Patna, P.S. Patna, District- Patna, Bihar.

¶12

... Respondents / Opposite Parties

¶13

--------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

¶14

--------For the Appellant: Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Achyut Keshav, A.A.G.-V For the JSFC: Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate ---------

¶15

02/Dated: 15.12.2025

¶16

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J. (Oral)

¶17

1. Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that the instant

¶18

Contempt Appeal is not maintainable, hence, he may be allowed to

¶19

withdraw this with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.

¶20

2. Obviously, there can be no objection to such an innocuous prayer.

¶21

3. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed with liberty as aforesaid.

¶22

4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶23

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)

¶24

(Rajesh Shankar, J.)

¶25

December 15, 2025

¶26

N.A.F.R./Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2

¶27

Uploaded on 16.12.2025

Praduman Tiwary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praduman Tiwary v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chanchal Chatterjee Alias Debasish Chatterjee Vs State of Jharkhand

Gramin Ekta Manch through Its President Namely Ranjit Singh Alias Bablu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Capital University (a Private University), through Its Authorized Signatory Namely Ajit Singh, Vs the State of Jharkhand, through Its Chief Secretary

Jharkhand Council for Democratic Right through Its General Secretary Manob Chowdhury Vs the State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Harjeet Singh Vs Income Tax Department Thro the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Dcit/Acit CIRCLE-1

The State of Jharkhand Vs Bandna Bharti