Rafique Ansari@ Rafique Anasri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the husband of the informant by causing injury on his head. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that there is no material in the record to suggest that the victim sustained any grievous injury. It is next submitted that because of monetary dispute persisting between the two families, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case to extract money from him. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶13

Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory

¶15

bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Abhiraj/

Rafique Ansari@ Rafique Anasri v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rafique Ansari@ Rafique Anasri v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaytree Devi Alias Gayatri Kumari Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Hakimuddin Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Goutam Mondal Alias Goutam Kumar Mondal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kanthi Prasad Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Arjun Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bahadur Singh Munda Vs the State of Jharkhand