Sachet Kumar Alias Sachet Kumar Thakur Vs State of Jharkhand

2025:JHHC:28132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5129 of 2025

----

Sachet Kumar @ Sachet Kumar Thakur, age 33 years, son of Chiranjiv Thakur, resident of OTC Ground, Shadeo Nagar, PO – Hehal, PS – Shukhdeo Nagar, District – Ranchi

¶5

.... Petitioner

¶6

-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party

¶7

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

¶9

For the Petitioner	:-	--- Mr. Prabhash Ch. Siniha, Advocate
For the State	:-	Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate
For the Informant	:-	Mr. Anil Kr. Singh, Advocate

¶10

¶11

07 /15.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned

¶12

counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant.

¶13

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra) P.S. Case No.79 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

¶14

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the land in question by way of registered sale deed No.806 dated 23.01.1991 which was executed by Roshan Nath Shahdeo, who happened to be the brother-in-law of the informant. He submits that the sale deed has been annexed as Annexure-2. He further submits that the purchase was made in the year 1991 and now the case has been lodged alleging that Roshan Nath Shahdeo has fraudulently sold the land.

¶15

--1--

¶16

A.B.A. No. 5129 of 2025

¶17

2025:JHHC:28132

¶18

4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of fraudulently purchasing the land by Roshan Nath Shahdeo and in view of that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may kindly be rejected.

¶19

5. Admittedly the sale deed No.806 dated 23.01.1991 is there contained in Annexure-2 and now the case has been registered and further if the deed is not in accordance with law the deed is required to be cancelled by way of moving before the appropriate Court. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar (Pandra) P.S. Case No.79 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶21

(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)

¶22

Dated 15.09.2025 Sangam/

¶23

--2--

¶24

A.B.A. No. 5129 of 2025

Sachet Kumar Alias Sachet Kumar Thakur v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachet Kumar Alias Sachet Kumar Thakur v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukund Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Priyanka Kumari through Her Natural Guardina and Fufa (Paternal Uncle), Namely Somra Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Krishna Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vinod Choudhary Alias Vinod Kumar Choudhary Alias Binod Choudhary Alias Binod Kumar Choadhary Vs State of Jharkhand

Alvinus Hembrom Alias Elvinos Hembrom Vs State of Jharkhand