Dismissed¶20

Anurag Jhawar v. Sidharth Jhawar And Anr.

Jharkhand HC2 Apr 2025C.R./49/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous; underlying suit dismissed for default by trial Court; Misc. Appeal No.665 of 2016 and Civil Revision No.49 of 2016; Anurag Jhawar v. Sidharth Jhawar; Chotanagpur Rope Works Pvt. Ltd.; High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi; Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.; Order No.07 dated 02.04.2025; no dispute by respondents' counsel (Nitin Kumar Pasari).

What did the court decide?

None; both Misc. Appeal No.665 of 2016 and Civil Revision No.49 of 2016 dismissed as infructuous. ¶20

Anurag Jhawar Vs Sidharth Jhawar And Anr. — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc. Appeal No.665 of 2016

¶2

Anurag Jhawar son of Sri Arun Kumar Jhawar, Director of Chotanagpur Rope Works, Pvt. Ltd., residing at No.51/C Gariahat Road, P.O. & P.S. Ballygunge, Kolkata, temporary address at Ranchi C/o Chotanagpur Rope Works Pvt. Ltd., .... .... …. P.O. Mahilong, P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi Appellant

¶3

Versus

¶4

Sidharth Jhawar son of Sri Arun Kumar Jhawar, Director of Chotanagpur Rope Works, Pvt. Ltd., having its office and factor within the VIII- Arrah, P.O. Mahilong, P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi residing at 2A, Sriniket, 14/9 Vasant Vihar, Kanke Road, Ranchi

¶5

Chotanagpur Rope Works Pvt. Ltd., having its registered office in

¶6

“Namaskar” Ground Floor at 24-A, Anil Roy Road, Kolkata and Head Office and works at P.O. Mahilong, P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi

¶7

.... .... .... Respondents

¶8

With

¶9

Civil Revision No.49 of 2016

¶10

¶11

Versus

¶12

Sidharth Jhawar son of Sri Arun Kumar Jhawar, Director of Chotanagpur Rope Works, Pvt. Ltd., having its office and factor within the VIII- Arrah, P.O. Mahilong, P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi residing at 2A, Sriniket, 14/9 Vasant Vihar, Kanke Road, Ranchi

¶13

Chotanagpur Rope Works Pvt. Ltd., having its registered office in “Namaskar” Ground Floor at 24-A, Anil Roy Road, Kolkata and Head Office and works at P.O. Mahilong, P.S. Tatisilwai, District Ranchi

¶14

.... .... .... Respondents

¶15

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶16

For the Appellant : Mr. Shusbham Kataruka, Advocate Ms. Khushboo Kataruka, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari, Advocate ------

¶17

Order No.07 / Dated :02.04.2025

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel on behalf of appellant/defendant no.1 in M.A. No.665 of 2016 that the matter has become infructuous as the suit from which the appeal has been preferred, has already been dismissed for default by the learned trial Court.

¶19

Learned counsel, Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari appearing on behalf of plaintiff/respondents herein, does not dispute the factual submission advanced on behalf of appellant/defendant no.1.

¶20

Under the circumstance, both these cases are dismissed as infructuous.

¶21

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶22

Anit

Anurag Jhawar v. Sidharth Jhawar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anurag Jhawar v. Sidharth Jhawar And Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamsundar Bharti Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bihar State Mineral Developmen Vs M/S Encon Builders I Pvt.Ltd

Kurban Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

The Branch Manager The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Babita Devi And Ors.

Most Meena Devi And Ors. Vs The Manager New India Insurance Company Ltd. And Ors.

Anugag Jhawar Vs Sidharth Jhawar And Anr.