Gansu Kujur Vs the State of Jharkhand

¶1

[ 2025:JHHC:15219 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶3

B.A. No. 4028 of 2025

¶4

Gansu Kujur, aged about 30 Years, S/O Chame Kujur, R/O Village Bakhar, P.O. Mandro & P.S. Narkopi, District Ranchi, Jharkhand

¶5

Pancham Oraon, aged about 30 Years, S/O Late Vishnu Oraon, R/O Village Bakhar, P.O. Mandro & P.S. Narkopi, District Ranchi, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus

¶6

The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party

¶7

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioners : Mr. Rishu Ranjan , Adv. For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam , Addl.PP.

¶9

02 / 12.06.2025 Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Narkopi P.S Case No. 43 of 2024 instituted under Sections 74, 76, 131, 303(2), 64 (1) & 62 of the B.N.S, 2023.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners attempted to commit rape upon the victim and committed theft of her mobile phone and outraged her modesty. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and because of some misunderstanding, this case has been instituted. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.12.2024, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the

¶12

informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail.

¶13

Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail .

¶14

Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Ranchi in connection with Narkopi P.S Case No. 43 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.

¶15

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶16

Smita/-

Gansu Kujur v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gansu Kujur v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukar Koeri Alias Budhan Koeri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Das Vs the State of Jharkhand

Raju Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Raju Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Karma Singh Alias Kameshwar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jakir Ansari Alias Jakir Vs the State of Jharkhand