Miraz Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Miraz Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Jharkhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024, subject to conditions of co-operating with the trial and furnishing his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking not to change his mobile number during the trial; I.A. No. 7542 of 2025 disposed of as infructuous.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, accused in Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024, should be admitted to bail. +1 more

Court's answer

The petitioner is enlarged on bail: he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024, on the conditions that he will co-operate with the trial and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial.

Ratio / Principle

I.A. No. 7542 of 2025 (prayer for early hearing of the bail application) is disposed of as infructuous, since the hearing of the bail application was taken up on the same day.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted — Accused in Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 for offences under Sections 111(2)(ii), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B/66C/66D of the I.T. Act; in custody since 03.11.2024 — High Court of Jharkhand enlarged the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, conditioned on co-operation with the trial and furnishing his mobile number and photocopy of Aadhar Card with an undertaking not to change the mobile number during trial — Interlocutory application for early hearing (I.A. No. 7542 of 2025) disposed of as infructuous.

( 2025:JHHC:19721 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 237 of 2025

Miraz Ansari, aged about 23 years, S/o –Late Sarfuddin Mian, R/o Village –Sindarjuri, P.O.+P.S. –Karmatar, District – Jamtara.

… Petitioner

Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------

Order No.04 Dated- 17.07.2025 I.A. No. 7542 of 2025

Heard the parties.

This interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this bail application.

Since the hearing of this bail application is taken up today, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

B.A. No. 237 of 2025

Heard the parties.

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111(2)(ii), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D of I.T. Act.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that there is no money trail and only because three mobile phones along with sim cards have been recovered from the petitioner, hence, he has been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that

the petitioner has been in custody since 03.11.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

Sonu-Gunjan/