It is alleged that plaintiffs are in possession over the suit property since 1967 and were running a shop in the name and style “Asia Cycle Store”. Subsequently they started selling motor parts and accessories in the name and style of “M/s. Taj Maruti Parts” and has paid rent till October, 2017. It is further stated that in the year 1983, the deceased husband of the defendant due to urgent need of money entered into an agreement with the father of the plaintiffs dated 07.09.1983 for the said shop admeasuring 367 sq. ft. situated at Imli Tola, Main Road, Ranchi beaing MS Plot No. 694, Municipal Holding No. 389 having Pakka Room roof by Asbestos duly registered before the Registrar at Ranchi vide Deed No. 7490. The terms and conditions of the said agreement is binding on the parties including the legal heirs, successors, administrator, legal representative/nominee. It is further alleged that the agreement dated 07.09.1983 specifically stipulates that if the land owner wants to dispose of/transfer/sell the said property in that case he/she has to sell/transfer to the plaintiff’s father only and by way of advance, a sum of Rs. 5000/- was paid to the defendant’s husband which has been admitted in the said agreement. It is further stated that on the death of the original executor of the agreement dated 07.09.1983, the shop premises has vested with the legal heirs/successors/administrator, legal representative/nominee of respective parties which is not in dispute. The rent has been paid by the plaintiffs without any default and the rent receipt is also issued by defendants in the name of the said shop i.e. “Taj Maruti Parts” till October, 2017. Thereafter, the plaintiffs paid rent for the month of November, 2017 but no rent receipt was issued. The plaintiffs also paid rent for the month of December, 2017 which was refused to accept by stating that the ownership has been transferred to Iqra Masjid Committee and the plaintiffs have to pay the rent in the name of Iqra Masjid Committee and refused to accept the rent amount. The plaintiffs approached the Iqra Masjid Committee and it was informed that only verbal talk has been made with the defendants but no agreement of sale has been executed hence it would not be proper to accept the rent. The plaintiffs send the rent through money-order at the address of defendants which was also refused. Again, for the month of
