Pradup Yadav Alias Manoj Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1739 of 2025

Pradup Yadav @ Manoj Yadav, aged about 42 years, Son of Sri Ruplal Yadav, R/O village Kusumbha, PO Sultana, P.S. katkamdag. Dist - Hazaribag, Jharkhand … Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand … opp. party

¶5

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kr. Msihra , Adv. For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey , Addl.. PP

¶7

02 / 18.03.2025 Heard the parties.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 323, 325, 341, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapon, attempted to murder Arjun Yadav. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the allegation of assault is against Rahul and Bandhu and there is no allegation of assault against the petitioner. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 18 of the anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶11

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Hazaribag in connection with Katkamdag P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the victim or their family members in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023 .

¶12

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶13

Smita/-

Pradup Yadav Alias Manoj Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradup Yadav Alias Manoj Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kundan Kumar Alias Kundan Ghatwar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rakesh Kumar Alias Rakesh Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dhruva Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vijay Besra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Firoj Khan Alias Firoj Alam Alias Firoj Vs the State of Jharkhand