Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C). No.7510 of 2016
------
Bishwa Nath Prasad
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others ..... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None
For the Respondents : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, SC-I Mr. Sachin Kumar, AC to SC I
Order No:-09 Dated:-13-06-2024
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
No one turns up on behalf of petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is no merit in this W.P. (C), hence, the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this W.P. (C).
Accordingly, this W.P. (C) stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Saroj/
Bishwa Nath Prasad
The State of Jharkhand & Others
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
