Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition against State of Jharkhand officials; counsel for respondents raised no objection. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 684 of 2022
Binod Anand @ Prajapati … … Petitioner
Versus
…. … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Prajapati, A.C. to
Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. K.C. Suman, A.C. to G.P.-II ----
1/01.07.2024 Mr. Vinod Prajapati, Advocate, on instruction of Mr. Prakash Kumar, counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition.
2. Mr. K.C. Suman, learned A.C. to G.P.-II appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection to the same.
3. Considering the said prayer of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Ritesh
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Binod Anand @ Prajapati
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary, Department of Labour and Exchange, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau at Daltonganj
The Additional Collector, Palamau at Daltonganj
The District Certificate Officer, Palamau at Daltonganj
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
