The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw the matter as it had become infructuous.
Permission to withdraw was allowed; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. ( C ) No. 6391 of 2016
Vikram Singh @ Sonu Singh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondent
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. …
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K.Gautam , Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. D.K.Dubey , Adv.
10 / 13.02.2024 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this petition as the matter has become infructuous.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Vikram Singh @ Sonu Singh
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
