PIL petition; petitioner in person sought leave to withdraw with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of grievance. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 3852 of 2023
Anand Kumar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors … … Respondents -------
CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
For the Petitioner : In Person For the Respondents : Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, AC to AAG II Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate
Order No. 05 : Dated 7th March, 2024
1. After some argument, the party-in-person seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance.
2. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the respondents.
3. In view of such submission, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Alankar/
Anand Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Arun Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
