Dismissed

M/S Bla Projects Pvt. Ltd. Represented through Telukula Krishna Shahu v. State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Transport

Jharkhand HC2 Sept 2024WPC/3811/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning a grievance against transport authorities was not pressed; counsel sought leave to withdraw with liberty to pursue other remedies. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty and disposed of pending interlocutory applications.

What the court decided

AI extract

M/S Bla Projects Pvt. Ltd. Represented through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Jharkhand HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No.3811 of 2022

¶2

------

¶3

M/S BLA Projects Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/S Banowari Lal Agarwala (Pvt. Ltd.), 31/1 N.S.B. Road, Raniganj, P.O. and P.S. Raniganj, District Burdwan District Godda Represented through its Authorized Representative-Telukula Krishna Shahu S/O Late T. Raghu Resident of Vasundhara Apartment, 63/129, B.T. Road, Viveknangar, P.O. and P.S. Khardah Kolkata-700119 posted as Project Manager, M/S/BLA Project Pvt. Ltd.

¶4

…. …. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi Office at FFP Building, HEC Area, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi.

¶7

2. District Transport Officer, Godda District, Office at D.T.O. Godda P.O. and P.S. Godda Town District Godda

¶8

.... .... Respondents

¶9

CORAM : HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI

¶10

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate Mr. Pandey Ashok Nath Roy, Adv. Ms. Kavita Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sushant Kumar, AC to SC-II ------

¶11

07/Dated: 02.09.2024

¶12

1. After some argument, Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to search out remedy for redressal of his grievance.

¶13

2. There is no opposition on the part of the learned State Counsel.

¶14

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶15

4. In consequent to withdrawal of this petition, pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

¶16

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, A.C.J.)

¶17

(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)

¶18

Rohit/-

¶19

M/S Bla Projects Pvt. Ltd. Represented through Telukula Krishna Shahu v. State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Transport

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

M/S Bla Projects Pvt. Ltd. Represented through Telukula Krishna Shahu v. State of Jharkhand through Its Secretary Deptt of Transport

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilchand Mahto Alias Dipchand Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Karan Paswan Alias Karan Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Central Coalfields Limited through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Vs Mukund Mohli Alias Mukund Mohali

Sursarita Vanijya Private Ltd. Thro Its Power of Attorney Holder v K Bhalotia Vs Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax

Bijay Kumar Ray Vs State of Jharkhand

Dharamendra Mistry Alias Dharmendra Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Jharkhand