A writ petition was called for hearing but no one appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls. Respondents' counsel submitted the petition lacked merit and diligence in prosecution. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3415 of 2019
Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondents ------
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Saurabh Sagar, AC to SC III ------
Order No.07 Dated- 04.07.2024
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in-spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting this writ petition as there is no merit in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sonu/Gunjan-
Petitioner (W.P. (C) No. 3415 of 2019)
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
