Rajesh Kumar Singhania v. State of Jharkhand And Ors.

What is this about?

Single-action disposition judgment: writ petition DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED because counsel submitted that he had 'no instruction from the petitioner'. Bench: Hon'ble Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary (sole signatory, para 11); decision dated 23.01.2024. Parties: Rajesh Kumar Singhania v. State of Jharkhand, Deputy Commissioner Koderma, Deputy Collector (Land Reforms) Koderma, Executive Engineer (PWD Road Construction Dept., Koderma), Shri Shyam Sundar Singhania. Counsel: Niraj Kishore (petitioner); H. P. Singh, AC to G.P.V (State). Zero statutes cited, zero precedents engaged, zero issues adjudicated, zero quantum. Cite-worthiness for doctrinal purposes: none; relevant solely as a specimen of procedural dismissal-as-not-pressed for want of client instructions.