Writ petitioner withdrew the application after argument to pursue another remedy; court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 2851 of 2018
---
Rambha Kumari ...Petitioner
Versus
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--
For the Petitioner : Mr. Laxman Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Sr. S.C.-III Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, A.C to Sr. S.C.-III
--
05/10.01.2024
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this writ application in order to avail any other appropriate remedy available under the law.
Learned counsel for the Respondent-State does not have any objection.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the instant application is dismissed
as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
jk
Rambha Kumari
State of Jharkhand
Principal Secretary, Department of Women, Child Development and Social Security, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi
District Social Welfare Officer, Ranchi
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
