Balkrishna Pandey v. the State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition; permission granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition; permission granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 196 of 2015
With
I.A. No.2614 of 2015
Balkrishna Pandey
…... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
.…. …. Respondents --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate
13/ Dated 16.02.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Prayer is allowed.
This application is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ambuj Nath, J.)
BS/
Balkrishna Pandey
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court