2016 reported in 2016 SCC OnLine Jhr. 2695 (Gopi Ram vs. CCL) , paragraphs 7 and 8, and has submitted that the employment secured through fraud is vitiated. He has further relied upon the judgment reported in (2020) 3 SCC 423 (State of Karnataka & Anr. vs. N. Gangaraj) , paragraphs Nos. 12, 13, and 15 to submit that the scope of judicial review is very limited. There is no scope for reconsideration of materials on record and coming to a different finding once there are concurrent findings recorded by two authorities. He has also relied upon the judgment reported in (2004) 2 SCC 105 (R. Vishwanatha Pillai vs. State of Kerala & Others), paragraphs 16, 17, and 19 to submit that long tenure of service is irrelevant and in the said case, there was 27 years of service. He has submitted that in case of giving false certificates, there is no protection of Article 311 of the Constitution of India. The learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment passed in L.P.A. No. 332 of 2020, paragraph 12, 13 and 14 to submit that in case of fraud/misrepresentation/impersonation, no relief can be given to the employee. The learned counsel has also relied upon the judgment reported in (2013) 9 SCC 363 (Devendra Kumar vs. State of Uttaranchal & Others), paragraphs 12 to 16 to submit that the said judgment deals with the appointment obtained by misrepresentation and also the scope of judicial review.
