Sumitra Mandal v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's counsel's prayer for withdrawal, with no objection from the respondents.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's counsel's prayer for withdrawal, with no objection from the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.162 of 2022
Sumitra Mandal
.......... Petitioner.
-Versus-
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kishore Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Soumya S. Pandey, A.C. to AAG-I For Res. No.3 : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
Order No.05 Date: 03.07.2024
as well as respondent no.3 have no objection to the said prayer.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Sanjay/
Sumitra Mandal
The State of Jharkhand
Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad
General Manager, UCO Bank, Hirapur Branch, Dhanbad
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court